|
Description
Reflecting our mission as a comprehensive public university
dedicated to serving the needs of Connecticut citizens, CCSU
consistently enrolls over 90% (93.7% in 2007) of its students
from Connecticut. Approximately 80% (82.7% in 2007) of CCSU’s
students commute from an off-campus location, which confirms our
mission as a regional university and our commitment to provide
access to higher education for students in central Connecticut.
About 40% of CCSU students are first-generation college
students. CCSU’s mission of serving the needs of Connecticut
students is also reflected in the gender and racial composition
of our student body: we enroll male and female students in
roughly equal numbers (52.5% female/47.5% male in 2007), and
minorities represent approximately 15% (16% in 2007) of our
student body. Also integral to CCSU’s mission is the commitment
to provide opportunities for continuing education and lifelong
learning: approximately one third (32.4% in 2007) of CCSU’s
students are
enrolled part-time.
Admissions
CCSU’s program of admission is
designed to ensure equal access to education and complies
judiciously with all legislative requirements to provide equal
educational opportunity. The University’s commitment to equal
educational opportunity is explicitly integrated into our
admission policy, which states that admission to CCSU depends on
the academic credentials presented by the applicant and
prohibits any form of discrimination, as described in the
Affirmative Action Policy.
CCSU’s admission and retention policies and procedures are
clearly stated on the University’s Web site, in the
undergraduate and graduate catalogs, and on all of our
application materials.
In keeping with CCSU’s commitment to provide
access to higher education for students with a range of
abilities, interests, and backgrounds, the University’s
standards for admission set reasonable
expectations for incoming students to ensure that a
preponderance of admitted students have the qualifications to
complete a college-level program of study. In fall 2006, the
University accepted 60% of its full-time freshman applicants, of
which 40% enrolled, with an average SAT combined score of
1027. Comparable data are
not available for graduate admissions.
The University offers several programs that
provide access and support to students with identified academic
needs. These include the Phoenix Program, the Educational
Opportunity Program (EOP),
and
ConnCAS (Connecticut College Access and
Success)—all of which are designed to improve the academic
skills of recruited undergraduate students who show promise but
do not meet all regular admission standards. Students in the
ConnCas and EOP programs are mainstreamed into the larger
student body each fall semester after completion of a five-week
summer educational experience. Full-time staff chart the
progress of these
students and then employ early intervention strategies to aid in
their success.
Students who disclose a learning, physical
or psychological disability receive reasonable accom-modations
and support services through the
Office of Student Disability Services.
In addition, recruited and admitted student athletes who fall
below regular admissions standards participate in a prescribed
support program through the
Academic Center for Student Athletes to
promote academic
success.
All programs for students with identified
needs administer their own budgets—with both internal and
external funding—and have dedicated staffs. The aim of all of
our programs for students with identified needs is to provide
them with the support that will enable them to have successful
academic experiences as mainstream members of CCSU’s student
body.
SAT scores are
utilized to determine
placement
in the first mathematics and writing courses for incoming
first-year students. Accuplacer is utilized to determine course
placement in mathematics and composition for transfer students
who do not have transfer credit for English and mathematics
coursework. Students identified with deficiencies in math and
writing are enrolled in developmental coursework in their first
semester. Additionally, both graduate and undergraduate
international students who apply for admission must demonstrate
their proficiency in English.
Retention and Graduation
CCSU’s
retention statistics
demonstrate that the institution admits students who can be
successful. Over the past five years, the first-to-second-year
retention rate has averaged 77%, with a low of 74% in 2001 and a
high of 80% in 2005. The retention rate for transfer students
has been slightly higher from the first to second year. The
first-to-third-year retention rate for the general student
population has also been high, averaging 64% over the past five
years.
First-to-second-year retention rates for
African Americans have ranged from a low of 71% to a high of 88%
over the past five years; these rates for Hispanic students have
ranged from 73% to 82% over the past five years.
Six-year graduation rates
for students reached a high of 44% in 2007, up from 40% in 2005
and 2006.
CCSU offers a wide range of accessible and
effective programs and services designed to address students’
needs and to ensure their academic success. The University’s
summer orientation program familiarizes undergraduate students
with academic requirements and helps incoming students prepare a
first-semester schedule of courses. The Learning Center and
Writing Center provide tutoring to support students’ learning
needs and to assist them in successfully completing assignments;
the Learning Center expanded its tutoring services by offering
online tutoring in 2007. The Learning Center also provides
intervention programs for students experiencing academic
difficulty. The Early Alert Program in the Office of Student
Affairs responds to information about students’ poor academic
performance or excessive absence from classes.
The First-year Experience (FYE)
program assists students with their orientation to CCSU and
reinforces college success skills. Faculty who teach in the FYE
program engage in faculty development sessions in order to work
together to support student success (Exhibit 6.1). The
Registrar’s Office communicates regularly with students about
their academic performance and about their progress toward
completion of their degrees, reminding them of deadlines and
outstanding requirements. The CAPP System on Central Pipeline
enables students to monitor their own academic progress and to
run “what if” scenarios for projecting course requirements.
Specialized units such as the Africana
Center and the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies,
respectively, provide tutoring for African-American and Hispanic
students. Pre-Collegiate and Access Services provide ongoing
support and guidance for students with identified academic
needs. The Committee on the Concerns of Women and the Women’s
Center serve the needs of women on campus.
The University
ensures that information about its services and programs is
widely published on the web, in orientation materials, in
departments and training sessions.
Retention
policies and procedures are clearly stated in Academic Standards
and Regulations, Grading System, Appeals for Grade Changes,
Change of Status, and Academic Misconduct sections of the
catalog.
CCSU outlines the number of credits for each classification
level, gives examples for calculating quality points and a grade
point average, and defines terms such as good standing, academic
warning, and dismissal hearing. The grade appeal policy
describes, in detail, the student’s rights and responsibility,
the faculty’s role, and the review board’s role.
A program for all students on academic
warning is offered each semester. Students facing dismissal who
commit to a plan of academic recovery may be granted an
additional semester on probation.
The primary mission of the Retention and
Graduation Council is to examine some of the specific factors
related to student success and recommend initiatives to improve
graduation and retention rates. In addition, academic and
co-curricular units across campus examine graduation and
retention data of various groups to inform decisions about their
programs.
The Office of Institutional Research
and Assessment (OIRA)
tracks and reports the number of degrees and certificates
awarded each year as well as institutional retention and
graduation rates. This information is communicated to campus
constituencies for program evaluation and
improvement. OIRA also collects and
disseminates graduation and retention rates for groups
specifically recruited by the University. These groups include
minority students, economically disadvantaged students admitted
though the Educational Opportunity Program (EOP),
students admitted through the Phoenix Program, athletes
receiving athletically based aid, and
Honors students.
Student Services
CCSU identifies its student
characteristics
by ethnicity, gender, full-time, part-time, undergraduate,
graduate (master’s and doctoral), as well as
age and campus housing.
Learning needs of its students are placed in the following
categories: student athletes, low-income, remedial placement,
first-generation, low SAT scores, disability, Fresh Start, and
Honors. The University responds by offering an array of
learning, wellness, psychological, and health support services
to assist with adjustment issues and to promote academic
success. These support services are included in student fees.
CCSU’s student services are guided by a
philosophy derived from its Mission Statement, which states that
“higher education should promote the personal and social growth
of our students, as well as their intellectual achievement and
professional competence. We provide various opportunities for
students to engage in activities or to join organizations and
clubs where they develop leadership and other social skills. We
foster a welcoming environment in which all members of our
diverse community receive encouragement, feel safe, and acquire
self-confidence.”
The mission and
vision for student services were recently reviewed and revised
prior to the Council for the Advancement of Higher Education (CAS)
self study that was undertaken in 2006/07.
CCSU recently established a strategic goal
for students’ co-curricular learning. The
Strategic Plan Goal 1
calls for the University to “identify student learning
outcomes for General Education, undergraduate majors, graduate
majors and co-curricular activities; establish their integration
in the curriculum; and implement outcomes based assessment for
all courses, programs, and student academic support services to
promote continuous improvement.” Academic Affairs and
Student Affairs are charged with developing enabling activities
to support the goal.
Students receive
a full range of protective and investigative
police services
around the clock. CCSU responds effectively to incidents or
issues that threaten to disrupt the learning environment by
coordinating conduct referrals to counseling or alcohol and
other drug education programs. Emergency management and threat
assessment teams provide proactive safety intervention. A
wellness team, chaired by the Director for Counseling and
Wellness, meets weekly to assess non-critical, non-threatening
student concerns.
The University provides safety and security
services to students to ensure maximum safety precautions.
Regarding
safety and security, the
University 1) uses expert safety consultants, 2) includes senior
administration in training sessions, 3) has a threat assessment
team and a notification system, 4) hires security staff and
certified law enforcement officers, 5) has excellent lighting on
campus, no-charge emergency with highly visible contact
information posted on each phone, 6) offers escort services, 7)
reviews its emergency response time, and 8) installs panic
buttons in appropriate offices. Advocacy services for women are
also available, and resident assistants receive safety training.
Available and
responsive information resources and services for students
include email, voicemail, faculty office hours, text messaging,
web-based information and services, and extended business hours.
Business software and hardware provide 24:7:365 access to grade
information, e-billing, e-tutoring, housing assignments,
policies/procedures, and the University activities calendar.
Public and electronic bulletin boards allow students to post
materials and notices to the campus.
CCSU uses a two-tiered advising
system for undergraduate students. The
Advising Center advises
non-matriculated students and students who have not yet declared
a major. The Advising Center assists students in scheduling
their general university requirements and in getting acquainted
with the resources available to them on campus. The Center’s
staff had contacts with 13,237 students in 2006-07 (duplicated
headcount), with its highest number of advisees from the School
of Arts and Sciences. Students preparing to enter a professional
program or the Business School may receive additional advisement
from the deans of those schools.
Once students declare an academic
major, they are assigned an academic faculty advisor within that
department. Full-time instructional faculty are required to
provide academic advising to students (Article 10.0). Full-time
faculty are contractually required to have five regularly
scheduled office hours per week on at least three teaching
days. (Part-time faculty are asked to make reasonable efforts
to advise their students as needed.)
Graduate students are assigned an
advisor at the time of their acceptance to a graduate program.
Information about the advisor is included in the letter of
acceptance, providing the name, telephone number and e-mail
address.
To evaluate this advising structure,
the University regularly surveys the departmental chairs and
conducts student satisfaction surveys.
Career Services
staff assist students with selecting experiential learning
opportunities, participating in community service, getting
involved in paid and voluntary career opportunities such as
internships, cooperative education, and selecting a major.
Approximately 1500 students participated in on-campus Career
Fairs in 2006-07. Between spring 2004 and fall 2007, 1007
students participated in
Cooperative Education
Placements.
The Office coordinates student employment campus-wide.
Student conduct
is governed by a
code
developed by and for the Connecticut State University System
that is subject to all federal and State laws. The code
describes prohibited conduct, procedures for filing a complaint,
disciplinary proceedings, pre-hearing investigation, hearing
procedures, interim suspension, academic misconduct,
disciplinary sanctions, and student records. The code outlines
the student’s right to and grounds for an appeal along with the
procedure for making an appeal. The Senior Conduct Officer
conducts training sessions each semester with
clubs/organizations, student government, residential staff
(including student employees), and other groups requesting such
training.
Health and counseling services are available
to students during regular business hours. Students receive
clear information about how to access services after regular
business hours. Residence Life staff and police are available
24:7:365. Students can participate in individual and group
counseling, get help with prevention and disease control, help
with and training on sexual assault, alcohol and substance
education, health and accident insurance, travel insurance,
general wellness and safety information.
The
Center for International
Education
advises and supports international students as they pursue their
studies on our campus, including assisting students in
processing immigration applications required to maintain legal
status, providing authorization to work on and off campus,
providing counseling on academic and cultural concerns and
organizing orientation, cross-cultural events and workshops. The
Center provides similar services for exchange students who come
to CCSU for a semester or year abroad. When CCSU students elect
to study abroad the Center advises them on course selection,
housing, immigration, and financial concerns. (See Exhibit 6.2.)
In all of its
policies, procedures, and practices, the University is
fundamentally and consistently committed to both the spirit and
intent of equal opportunity, as well as to its own goals for
diversity. Our Office of Diversity and Equity oversees our
compliance with equal opportunity and investigates all
complaints. The Faculty Senate’s Diversity Committee sponsors
programs and conducts research to support a more diverse
community. Through clubs, dedicated offices, and centers, the
University provides safe and supportive outlets for
underrepresented and nontraditional groups to interact and
express themselves, including women, veterans, representatives
of different cultural, religious, and ethnic groups and diverse
sexual orientations, and members with disabilities. To enhance
the retention and graduation of students from underrepresented
populations, the University has hired a new, cabinet-level
position of Chief Diversity Officer, who has been charged with
promoting efforts to improve the diversity climate on campus.
The President also appointed a Blue Ribbon Commission on
Diversity, which has presented recommendations for improving the
diversity climate and enhancing services and support for
minority students. The University also sponsors and supports a
wide range of events and
initiatives to promote
diversity.
The institution supports
opportunities for student leadership and participation in campus
organizations and governance in the following ways:
Student leadership development,
campus employment,
clubs, societies, and organizations.
Students have over 100 clubs and organizations from which to
choose, including
Student Government Association, Graduate
Student Association,
Student Union Board of Governors, and
Inter Residence Council. They also have
the option to start a new club/organization. Most student
leadership opportunities are voluntary and the operating budget
for the organizations is supported by student fees and
fundraising. Other leadership opportunities for many students
include campus employment, internships, graduate assistantships,
cooperative education,
volunteerism, athletic and recreation participation, service
learning, and community service.
Full-time and residential students have
available to them a full complement of health care services. In
addition to enjoying opportunities available to all students,
residential students pay an inter-residence council fee that
supports community-building activities among residential
students. The residential community employs two student
programmers who are charged with identifying and facilitating
educational sessions for all residents. Each of the 68 student
resident assistants is responsible for hosting 12 programs each
academic year. Students may form or join social travel groups
such as the band, theatre groups, talent shows, and Oxford
Debates.
Students receive a copy of both the
Student Handbook,
Survival Guide (6.3) and the university catalog. Both contain
general information about the University, a comprehensive list
of services and resources, important phone numbers, the conduct
code, list of administrators, emergency information, on-campus
living guide, a campus map and the alma mater. Graduate students
also are given a Graduate Studies Handbook (Exhibit 6.4). The
student handbooks and catalogs are also available online. In
addition, information about student services is provided in the
Registration Booklets (Exhibit 6.5) for fall and spring
semesters; the University View Books (Exhibit 6.6) and
Continuing Education Bulletins (Exhibit 6.7) also provide access
information for student services.
New student orientation is open to all
undergraduate students at no additional fee. During orientation,
students receive verbal and written information about academic
advising, housing, financial aid, health and counseling
services, academic support, technology, bookstore, etc. Students
also get a demonstration of how to access information on the
web.
Orientation participants engage in
activities that help them to develop meaningful interpersonal
relationships, learn strategies for a successful transition into
college (social and support services), learn rights and
responsibilities, and become familiar with campus-wide safety
and security.
Job descriptions for
professional staff in student services
are developed in accordance with the CSU-SUOAF CBA (Article
10 and Article 12) and
procedures developed by
the Council on Employee Relations. The Office of Diversity and
Equity and the Human Resources Department ensure that all
applicants meet the minimum education and training requirements
reflected in the official job description in order to be
considered for employment. Student services staff receive
ongoing training and professional development relevant to their
field of expertise. Funds to support professional development
and training are available from departmental budgets as well as
through the CSU-SUOAF contract. Professional growth and
improved competence is an integral part of the evaluation
instrument for Student Services staff.
The University dedicates space to support
student service policies and procedures. The Student Center
includes space for student clubs and organizations, meeting
rooms, retail stores, and food services. Student support
services, such as admissions, financial aid, bursar, and
registrar are currently in dedicated spaces.
Funding resource requests are made by
managers of the specific areas who are responsible for
implementing student services policies and procedures to assure
that all areas are adequately funded. If additional funding is
needed, the University Planning and Budget Committee and the
President review these requests in light of the university goals
and objectives.
Financial Aid
All federal, state and institutional
guidelines for awarding financial aid, including non-need based
aid are followed.
Criteria for awarding aid
are transparent and publicized. Financial aid information is
available in print form and electronically. The University is
dedicated to reducing financial barriers that limit access and
ensuring the fair and equitable awarding of financial aid to all
eligible students. Awards are based on equitable application of
clear and publicized criteria. The amount of financial aid
awarded has more than doubled since the last NEASC visit, having
increased from $26,375,820 in 1998-99 to $60,054,525 in 2007-08.
The goal of the
Financial Aid Office is to facilitate a
comprehensive and affordable education for students attending
CCSU. The Financial Aid Office administers federal, state, and
institutional programs (including grants, scholarships, loans,
employment and veteran’s benefits); a complete list of
scholarships and aid programs funded by the University is
available in the
University catalog. The
office coordinates the University's various scholarship and
non-need-based grant and award programs and loans. Students may
also be supported with on-campus employment. Federal Work-Study
is awarded to students as part of their financial aid package.
Job opportunities are listed in the Career Center.
The Financial Aid Office conducts business
in accordance with a comprehensive procedures manual maintained
in the Office. Procedures are consistent with guidelines and
authority of the Connecticut State University System, guidelines
suggested by the National Association of Student Financial Aid
Administrators, and from the National Association of University
Business Officers.
Recreation,
Intramural Sports, and Athletics
Prior to fall
2006, recreational opportunities were very limited. Within the
past two years, CCSU changed the reporting line for recreation
from Athletics to Student Affairs and added new resources in
excess of $144,000. New resources also included two full-time
professional staff. The restructured programs outgrew its new
resources within the first semester. Records show that within
the first semester of operation, the program served over 10,559
students.
Online and paper
copies of handbooks outline the registration process,
eligibility criteria, leadership responsibilities, sports
ethics, schedules requirements, competition levels, game
requirements, student code infractions and consequences, health
safety and security regulations, as well as the alcohol and drug
policies.
The University audits regularly all
financial records including those for student fees assigned to
student government for reallocation. Recreation staff verifies
participation eligibility, health clearance and accident and
health insurance.
In addition to following university policies
on academics, eligibility, financial aid, ethical conduct,
recruiting, and amateurism, CCSU is certified by the NCAA. CCSU
provides student insurance, safety training and supervision,
participation policies and procedures, integrity policies and
procedures,
athletic academic support
services and wellness promotion. Policies for the renewals or
denial of scholarships to athletes are stated and widely
publicized.
The Intercollegiate Athletics
Program at Central Connecticut State University contributes
positively to the personal development of approximately 400
student athletes by providing a wide range of opportunities for
participation in 18 sponsored sports as a certified member of
NCAA Division I and the Northeast Conference.
Student athletes are held to the same
academic standards as other CCSU students. In addition, athletes
in each sport must meet NCAA mandates for academic progress
(APR). Student athletes receive support from the Academic Center
for Student Athletes in meeting their academic goals. Six-year
graduation rates for student athletes who receive aid have been
consistently above the campus average, averaging 49% over the
past ten years.
Student athletes also serve on the Student Athlete Advisory
Committee (SACC), which represents the interests of
student-athletes on our campus and beyond. Student members of
SACC have input into the rules, regulations and policies that
affect the lives of student-athletes at Central as well as
addressing issues of national concern. Selected members of SACC
represent CCSU at conference-level meetings that focus on issues
broadly affecting student athletes.
Ethical
Standards
Ethical
Standards are primarily communicated through the
CCSU
Student Handbook.
The “Code
of Conduct,”
“Commitment
to Civility”
and a “Non-discriminatory” clause are some examples of Ethical
Standards. When conditions require action, communication is made
to students on specific topics. For example, a year ago a
letter was sent to students warning about the illegal
downloading of music, and possible actions that might be taken
by the record companies. CCSU also adheres to ethical standards
issued by the State of Connecticut,
Board policy
and professional organizations such as NASPA.
Some staff including counselors, nurses and
doctors require additional licensing certifications. Staff
members in confidential services must adhere to all requirements
and policies set forth by their licensing boards.
Ethical Standards are shared with student
leaders during training programs. Recently, students drew up a
draft of a Code of Ethics to be used by student organizations.
This draft is being reviewed by university administrators.
Student Rights and Responsibilities
Student rights and responsibilities are
clearly stated in the
Student Handbook
and in the Graduate Student handbook, which are available
both online at the CCSU website and in hard copies in the
offices of Student Affairs and School of Graduate Studies,
respectively. The Student Handbook, for example,
provides policy information on disability discrimination, racism
and acts of intolerance, and hearings on judicial procedures. In
addition, the policy on academic misconduct, passed in 2001,
clearly defines expectations for students and procedures to
follow.
Grievance policies and procedures are stated
within the
CSU Student Code of Conduct and Statement of Judicial Procedures.
The Code is made available online and in a printed publication.
The Office of Student Affairs distributes and makes these
available to students, faculty and staff, both on-line and in a
printed publication.
To ensure fair and consistent administration
of the Code of Conduct, Student Conduct administrators and
Hearing board members undergo training in student conduct
matters. This training meets the standards established by the
Association of Student Judicial Affairs (ASJA), an international
association for student conduct officers at colleges and
universities. Sanctioning guidelines are utilized to ensure
appropriate and consistent resolutions.
Board policy
outlines information to be included in a student’s permanent
record, the length of time records must be maintained and how
they must be maintained. Directory information is available
unless students sign a non-disclosure statement in the Office of
the Registrar. All inquiries for student records are protected
by FERPA and are referred to the Office of the Registrar for
processing. All other requests for information are handled on a
case-by-case basis and must be accompanied by a signed release
from the student. Health and psychological information is
regulated by industry standards. Students' rights to privacy
regarding disciplinary action are also protected by guidelines
established and enforced by the University. Policies governing
the security of student identity are monitored by a security
matrix disseminated by the Connecticut State University System.
Appraisal
Admissions
Enrollment data show that the University is
meeting its goal to serve Connecticut students. However,
building a more diverse student body remains a challenging goal.
The student body is over 73% White with Black/Non-Hispanic
students constituting the largest minority population at 7.29%,
followed by Hispanic at 5.43%, Asian/Pacific Islander 2.69%,
non-resident alien 1.82%, Indian/Alaskan native .49%, and
unreported ethnicity as 9.17%. Compared to the demographic
composition of recent graduates from Connecticut’s public high
schools, students who report a race/ethnicity other than White
are underrepresented among CCSU’s undergraduate student
population, although it is important to recognize that not all
high school graduates have completed the coursework required for
college admission. The graduation rate of minority students at
CCSU is comparable to those at the other three CSU institutions.
The University’s Office of
Institutional Research and Assessment has examined the
relationship between SAT/ACT scores and class rank on subsequent
student performance to better understand their reliability as
predictors of student success. Among incoming full-time,
first-time students, the factor most predictive of success has
been
high school class rank.
SAT scores have also been predictive of success for those
graduating in the top half of their high school class, but these
scores did not predict success for full-time, first-time
students who graduated in the bottom half of their high school
class.
OIRA also tracks performance
of students who are admitted through CCSU’s conditional
admission programs (ConnCAS, EOP, and Phoenix), and this
information is shared with relevant faculty and administrators.
In general, students who did not qualify for regular admission
were retained and graduated at lower rates than were those
students who did qualify for regular admission. One exception
was the EOP Program, whose students were retained at slightly
higher rates than the student population at-large but graduated
at lower rates, suggesting that students may experience
difficulties after support services are removed in their second
year of
college.
The Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
is administered every two years to undergraduate students.
Students have an opportunity to evaluate the following regarding
admissions: staff provide personalized attention prior to
enrollment (Item #7) and counselors accurately portray the
campus in their recruiting practices (Item #33). While the gap
between students’ satisfaction and level of importance in 2004
and 2006 was not markedly different from students’ ratings at
other institutions, the University still aspires to improve in
both of these areas.
Retention and Graduation
Both retention and graduation have
been targeted for marked improvement in the institution’s
strategic plan. After several years of small but steady declines
from 45% in 1998 to 40% in 2004, CCSU’s six-year graduation rate
for full-time, first time students has begun to show
improvement, having increased to 44% for those entering in fall
2001, and reported in 2007. Although CCSU’s six-year graduation
rate has fallen below the average graduation rate at our
national peer institutions, recent improvements in CCSU’s
one-year retention rate of full-time, first-time students would
suggest that graduation rates should be expected to improve over
the next 3-5 years. For full-time, first-time students who
entered CCSU in fall 1997, the
retention rate was 69%,
but ten years later, for the group entering in fall 2006, this
rate had improved to 79%.
The University is also concerned
that 43% of our entering full-time, first-time students in fall
2007 required remediation in English, math, or both, although
this proportion has declined by 7%-12% since 2003-2005. The new
“Bridges Program” in collaboration with area high schools is
intended to reduce the number of entering students requiring
remediation. Further, the subsequent success of students who
complete remedial coursework with a grade of C- or better is
comparable to students who were not identified for
remediation.
For full-time, first-time students entering
CCSU in fall 1999 and later, the one-year retention rate for
minority students has averaged about one percentage point lower
than the retention rate for white students. Six-year graduation
rates for minority students in the same cohorts, however, have
ranged from 8-12 percentage points lower than those of white
students but have generally trended upwards over the past five
years, while the graduation rate for white students has
generally remained in the mid-40% range.
Student Services
Based on
SSI results, students
indicate that they are satisfied with campus services such as
library resources and services, computer labs, availability of
tutoring services, online access to services, and availability
of counseling services. On the other hand, students reported
lower satisfaction with services in the areas of academic
advising and career education. Students also reported a lack of
mentors to guide life and career goals. Students reported lower
satisfaction in areas that might interfere with time-to-degree.
Those are challenges with the ability to register for classes
with few conflicts, sufficient courses available each term,
convenient registration processes and procedures, help to set
goals to work toward, applying academic major to career goals,
and getting the “run-around” when seeking information on campus.
Students rated advising and course
availability as the items of greatest import and lowest
satisfaction on both the 2004 and 2006
Student Satisfaction Surveys.
CCSU is in the process of responding to the
advising surveys, both of which indicated serious deficits. The
Graduation and Retention Council
and the Advising Task Force, both collaborative initiatives
between Academic and Student Affairs, have been meeting
regularly to address advising delivery systems, administrative
structure, transfer advising, faculty adviser load, adviser
training, first-year student advising, evaluation of advising
and other issues.
In addition, the Advising Center has been
without consistent leadership for over six years. NEASC
reported that the Advising Center was under-resourced and CCSU
lacked commitment to advising ten years ago. The CAPP degree
audit system is the only improvement that has been made since
then.
Resources to support student advising in the
academic schools have not been proportionately allocated, which
has made advising uneven across academic schools and
departments. For instance, the Schools of Business, Engineering
and Technology, and Education and Professional Studies have
fewer students to advise but have substantially more
administrative faculty dedicated to student advising, whereas
the School of Arts and Sciences (which has 69% of the spring
2008 FTE enrollments) has only one person dedicated to student
advising. In addition, student-faculty ratios are uneven across
academic departments. Given the significant disparity across
academic departments, students in some departments are not
afforded as much time for advising as students in other academic
departments.
Career service challenges were
revealed during a survey of spring 2007 graduates. An exit
survey of 654 graduating seniors indicates that only 381
students used Career Services.
Some respondents believe that not
all students are well informed about services available to them
and that better coordination of services is needed. Others
report concerns about students who register late and the problem
with getting a reasonable class schedule. Efforts to alleviate
these problems have included adopting new course scheduling
software, opening additional sections of courses in anticipation
of late registrations, and preparing a 15-hour schedule for all
entering first-year students. Additional challenges center on
the number of hours that our students work, the need to get
students involved on campus, and the importance of creating a
more diverse student body. The University has addressed these
concerns by establishing more on-campus employment
opportunities, integrating a co-curricular component in
First-year Experience (FYE) courses, and instituting a new
program of scholarships to attract students from
underrepresented groups to specific majors (e.g., education,
engineering, science). The need to increase the number of
residence halls and to provide better orientation and academic
support were also cited as challenges for the University.
Survey results from the SSI (’04 &
’06) show four of the University’s overall strengths associated
with equity: students feel there is a strong commitment to
diversity; they feel welcome on the campus; they feel free to
express themselves; and they feel that the campus is safe and
secure. Despite these positive indicators, two high profile
incidents in the past year—including a “satire” on rape and an
offensive cartoon in our student newspaper—have resulted not
only in some very negative publicity for the University but also
in vocal complaints from some students and faculty that the
University administration has not been sufficiently sensitive or
responsive to the concerns of women, of GLBT, and of racial
minorities. As a result, the University has taken a number of
decisive steps to improve our diversity climate, including
creating a cabinet-level position of Chief Diversity Officer,
convening a Blue Ribbon Commission on Diversity, and piloting
the integration of diversity content in several courses—among
many other initiatives.
Job descriptions for student
services professionals have not kept pace with serving the
changing needs of today’s students and families. Staff members
need professional development in best practices, use of
technology, professional standards, program and service goal
setting and assessment, project management, and budget
management.
Orientation
Last year, the Orientation budget was
increased from $49,000 to $94,000. The University hired a
full-time Assistant Dean of New Student Transitions and a
full-time clerical staff member to support the program. Since
2005 to the present, participation in new student orientation
increased from 76% to 94%. Evaluations completed by students and
parents who participated rated all aspects of the program
positively. Several challenges to improving orientation include
the rising cost of food and housing to participate in overnight
orientation.
Financial Aid
According to the SSI, students
reported a higher level of satisfaction from ’04 to ’06 in the
timeliness of financial aid award notifications, availability of
financial aid counseling, and with getting help to identify
other resources for financing education. However, the gap
between satisfaction and importance indicates that students
still want improved financial services.
The challenge is that
tuition and fees continue to rise. As
expected, the number of students applying for and receiving
financial assistance has
increased. After deducting discounts and allowances, net
expenses for undergraduate scholarships and graduate fellowships
was $17,843,565 in 2007-08, versus $15,722,362 in 2006-07.
Students report working more to finance their education, and
more are filing for and receiving aid.
According to the survey
data
provided by the Connecticut State University System Office, 55%
of students were supported from federal, state and personal
loans, an increase of 14% from 1999. This indicates students are
relying on loans to support their educational expenses. The
increasing cost of college education has become a major factor
in changing students’ educational financing pattern.
Recreation, Intramural Sports, and
Athletics
Recent surveys taken by students, including
the Student Satisfaction Survey, confirm students’ interest in
recreation and intramural sports. During fiscal year 2006/07
Recreation was transferred to the Division of Student Affairs.
In order to launch a successful program, over 7% of the
operating budget for Student Affairs was dedicated to recreation
during the 2006/07 fiscal year. During fall 2007 an average of
100 students per day participated in open recreation.
The University’s commitment to the
recreational interests of its students has been demonstrated
with additional resources being dedicated for further
expansion. During the spring 2008 semester approximately 100
students and two graduate assistants were employed by the
Recreation department. For fiscal year 2008/09 a total of
$600,000 in funding has been set aside to purchase equipment and
provide new facilities for recreation, with some facilities
planned within the residence halls.
In 2003-04, 11 teams (61%) met the
NCAA Cut Rate Score for the Annual Academic Progress Report. In
2006-07, 16 teams (92%) met the cut rate score; only two did
not.
Facilities
Although student service facilities have
suffered from the same constraints as other university
divisions, significant investments have been made over the past
several years to accommodate the ever-growing and changing needs
of our student population. Over the past ten years, the
University has invested over $50 million to improve student
service facilities, and the institution is projected to spend
more than $50 million on student support services over the next
decade. In addition, the University has spent over $50 million
dollars upgrading residence halls, which includes improvement in
study and computer areas for students.
Nevertheless, some facilities are too small
for the services they provide; others require deferred
maintenance, and some services are separated in different
buildings. For example, the facilities for advising and career
services are in need of renovation. The Learning Center is too
small for the number of students it serves, and the Writing
Center, which serves a similar clientele, is located in another
building. Similarly, the Police Station is too small for the
needs of its staff.
However, housing the Bursars Office and
Financial Aid in the same building (Memorial Hall), on the same
floor and in the middle of the campus, has dramatically reduced
the “run-around” that students complain about. Additionally,
increasing the number of procedures that can be done on line has
substantially reduced the volume of traffic in those areas.
Instituting online billing changed students’ satisfaction
results with the billing process from an institutional challenge
in 2004 to an institutional strength in 2006.
Projection
The newly hired Director of Recruitment and
Admissions and the Enrollment Management Team will review
challenges such as diversifying the student body, evaluating
admissions criteria for specifically recruited groups, upgrading
technology (i.e., accept digital transcripts; accuracy in
live/real time admissions status, virtual tours, pod cast),
enhancing admissions materials, and streamlining the admissions
process. Having one full-time professional staff member in
Admissions evaluate transcripts will reduce inconsistencies in
the interpretation of transfer credits.
Research will be done in 2008-09 to
determine why many students who persist to a fourth year do not
graduate. For the first-time, full-time students who entered in
1999 through 2001 between 54% and 57% persisted to a fourth
year, yet about a quarter of these students did not complete a
degree within the next two years.
Because many of
the programs for special populations are administered by
different departments and supervisors, there is a lack of
coordination in serving these populations. There is also much
duplication of effort that has resulted from administering
separate programs with similar missions. As a
result, efficiencies in staffing, program funding, and other
resources are not being realized. In the future the University
should perform program audits, study best practices, and discuss
the benefits that would result from bringing programs that have
similar missions under common coordination.
Two significant
initiatives will address developmental and remedial issues going
forward. The Department of Mathematical Sciences will pilot an
intensive developmental math course sequence in fall 2008 that
will provide an opportunity for students to achieve
college-level math proficiency by the end of the first
semester. Plans are also in place to pilot a “Bridges
Program”
that is designed to reduce entering college students’ need for
remediation. A longer-term objective at CCSU is to build a
college preparatory magnet school on our campus in collaboration
with five of our principal feeder school districts.
Plans for
improving student retention and graduation rates are outlined in
a report by the
Retention and Graduation
Council.
The recommendations include actions to improve the academic
success of specific subpopulations of students: commuter,
residential, transfer, and part-time. A new program of small
grants from the Offices of Student Affairs and Academic Affairs
will fund projects by each of the Council’s five subcommittees.
To improve the
chances for success of students who get off to a poor academic
start and to reduce the number of students who are academically
dismissed, the Retention and Graduation Council is developing an
early intervention program that identifies students who are not
succeeding academically by the midpoint of their first semester
and will implement an academic intervention to help them
complete their first semester successfully.
Implementing the recommendations of the
Advising Task Force will be a high priority for CCSU. The
recommendations of the Task Force include changing the reporting
line for the Advising Center and Career Services from Student
Affairs to Academic Affairs, providing professional development
for advisors, rewarding faculty for advising activities,
conducting campus-wide forums to discuss and assess best
practices in advising, and integrating a career education focus
to advising.
To address
student complaints about “runaround,” the offices of Recruitment
and Admissions, Financial Aid, the Registrar, and the Bursar are
working with the Chief Administrative Officer to design a new
space that will combine those services in a single location.
Plans are also underway to integrate the Advising Center and
Career Services into a single unit with a mission to assist
students with both academic and career planning. Another plan is
to integrate the
Writing Center
and the
Learning Center,
with long-range plans to develop an “Academic Success Center.”
To meet the goal of having 100% of our
athletic teams meet the NCAA cut score on the APR, each coach
has developed a strategic plan for attaining and maintaining
high academic standards. Two additional study hall spaces in
Kaiser Hall are being completed. These facilities will reduce
the overcrowding in the current limited space and foster greater
academic success. It will further enhance the overall learning
environment for student athletes in maintaining all University
and NCAA academic standards.
To address the shortage of space available
for recreational activities, the University plans to invest $7
million from its reserves as part of an extensive renovation
that will include establishing a dedicated field for intramural
recreation, as well as other improvements to our athletic fields
and facilities that will benefit both recreational and varsity
athletes. The University has also earmarked several hundred
thousand dollars in 2008-09 to establish satellite fitness
facilities in several residence halls on campus.
In the upcoming
year the Student Activities and Leadership Development Office
will publish a “Handbook for Student Organizations.” This
handbook will include the Code of Ethics that was recently
drafted by a student committee and approved by various student
organizations. Additionally a Student Employee Guide that was
devised for use in our Student Center will be reviewed and
revised for possible use throughout the offices within student
affairs.
As part of a
system-wide effort, Human Resources will be working with Student
Affairs to identify job descriptions for administrative faculty
that are outdated, inaccurate, and not reflective of the best
practices in the field. While this review will be done for all
administrative faculty job description across the campus,
particular attention will be paid to the student affairs
descriptions, many of which have not been updated in many
years. Student Affairs staff will be encouraged to participate
in the numerous professional development activities on campus
through the Human Resources Department, the Information
Technology Department, and the State In-service Training
program. Moreover, the Human Resources office will work with
the Vice President for Student Affairs to identify specific
training needs for student affairs staff and to determine the
best approach for delivering the training. Increased funding
will be made available for additional professional development
activities through the many professional organizations with
which the Student Affairs staff are associated.
The
mission and vision for Student Affairs will be re-visited within
the next calendar year to ensure alignment with the needs of our
students, as well as with the goals of the University.
Institutional Effectiveness
The institution regularly plans and sets
targets for the number, type, and profile of incoming students.
Adjustments to admission practices and policies are made based
on a careful review of acceptance rates, yield rates, and the
profile of the incoming class of first-year students.
Retention and graduation rates of full-time,
first-time students, as well as transfer students, are also
closely monitored, and these metrics are linked to specific
targets in the Strategic Plan (Objectives 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3).
All of these measurements are tracked and disseminated by the
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
The evaluation of student services is
carried out on the institution-level and also on the
program-level. The primary instrument for the evaluation of
student services at the institution-level is the Noel-Levitz
Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI), which is administered to
the entire student population on a two-year cycle. The SSI
assesses student satisfaction and perception on seven scales:
student centeredness, campus life, instructional effectiveness,
recruitment and financial aid effectiveness, campus services,
academic advising effectiveness, registration effectiveness,
safety and security, and campus climate. Results from the
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) supplement findings
from the SSI, and results from the Cooperative Institutional
Research Program (CIRP) Freshman Survey are used to inform
programming for entering students, such as Orientation and the
First-Year Experience.
Various units in Student Affairs also
conduct program-level assessment initiatives. Notably the
Student Center and the Department of Residence Life administer
the Educational Benchmarking, Inc. surveys for their respective
areas, and make adjustments based on the findings. Additionally,
all units within Student Affairs completed a Council on the
Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS)
Self-Assessment during AY 2006-07 (Exhibit 6.8). These
evaluations were used to identify programmatic strengths and
weaknesses and to develop budget requests to acquire resources
where deficiencies were identified.
The next steps in advancing institutional
effectiveness efforts in student-related services will involve
developing a broad-based system of regular review. A particular
emphasis will be placed on identifying and assessing
co-curricular learning outcomes, as called for in the Strategic
Plan. A formal review process similar to the process developed
for the Academic Assessment Committee is envisioned to provide
feedback, communicate institutional information, and share
successful practices.
|